Or are you Negative?
Clint, please forgive me in advance for what I feel at times is my wooden head. Sometimes I feel so dense when trying to absorb some of your well explained and defined teachings. If anyone spends time reading or viewing your work they will inevitably come across, call it, "positive" law and "negative" law. My whole life and probably everyone elses we have been taught to think positive, be positive, positive is a good thing and negative is a bad thing. Even with electrical currents positive is the "live" and negative is the "ground", so positive is life and negative is dead ... right? Apparently not?
You teach that positive law is the legal (public) realm and negative law is Jehovah (private|). Now as I read your book I do get it in the context that you write it but once I've left those pages I fall back into my old programming? When I come across someone who is perhaps feeling down or if I'm explaining something I tend to say "well if you look at it from a positive perspective" or if what we think about we bring about we want to think positive because we want to bring more "good" things into our lives ... right? Nope, perhaps not?
I want to try and correct the language that I use and the way I speak it instead of casting spells continually, but even if I do actually at some point "get it" I will always have to revert back to my old pattern that positive is a good thing because absolutely no one will understand if I use negative in a postive (good) way? Now that this is clear as mud for everyone, what are your thoughts and how can we stay congruent with our language in the private (Jehovah) world while still navigating the artificial world of persons?
kind blessings to All
Forgive me for not getting to this sooner...
First, let us not mix common language of slaves with the Law Latin of slavemasters. Be positive is not incorrect use of the mongrel English language. But we are not concerned with that slave language except as it harms us for not recognizing the dueality and inversity of words. Using common language in a legal setting is disasterous.
You could think of it this way:
God's Law positively requires non-participation in the artificial legal laws of man (commerce). The legal Law requires participation in its matrix, and thus requires a direct, positive violation of God's Law. God's Law is negative because it says THOU SHALT NOT DO. Legal (man's) law is positve because it says THOU SHALT DO what God's Law says not to do.
To be in the negative Law is to deny, to not accept, to oppose the postive (man's) law. To deny persona (status) in the legal matrix, for starters. Thus, negativity in this meaning is simply the lack of anything postively added. To accept anything legal is to positively add that false thing, which menas accepting the opposing law that governs that postive thing or right. Negative rights are self-evident and of God, whereas all rights of legal persons are positve law rights, rights allowed and retractable by the master (false God) government. Negative is also equal to inherent. Positive is equal to not natural.
This is perhaps a bit simplistic, so, let's allow the legal books to clarify: In viewing these definitions, remember that what is legal is always opposed to Nature, as some-thing positively charged (accused and adjudged) or negatively discharged back into non-Existence (as end of contract). These are in my book...
—=—
“Positive rules of law [AS DISTINGUISHED FROM maxims (Principles of law) or conclusions of reason] will be receded from [given up or dispensed with] rather than that crimes and wrongs should remain unpunished.”
—RECEDITUR A PLACITIS JURIS, POTIUS QUAM INJURIAE ET DELICTA MANEANT IMPUNITA. Bac. Max. 55, reg. 12. (Black4)
—=—
But remember, commerce, that is contract law, is positive law, and citizens and persons do not exist anywhere in nature. What is positive (a creation of mans legal law) is not and cannot be bound by the Laws of Reality, of Nature, of YHVH.
The word legal, in its Truest sense as man’s “positive law,” literally means not of Nature and in opposition to God, as the undoing of God’s Law.
POSITIVE LAW - Law proper, as opposed to moral laws, or to natural or “God-made” law. An enforceable legal rule which prohibits or requires certain conduct. Often contrasted with moral law. Lawyers speak of positive law to distinguish it from other rules similarly expected to be followed but not conduct-related. For example, many of the provisions of the Laws of Manu deal with morality or hygiene. This made it hard for jurists and legal historians to later sort out what was intended to be enforceable by the state,s, and the moral or religious rules, which serve as guidance to the citizens but do not attract the attention of law enforcement. (Lloyd Duhaime Legal Dictionary, inline at duhaime.org)
POSITIVE LAW - Law actually and specifically enacted or adopted by proper authority for the government of an organized jural society. "A 'law,' in the sense in which that term is employed in jurisprudence, is enforced by a sovereign political authority. It is thus DISTINGUISHED not only from all rules which, like the principles of MORALITY and the so-called laws of HONOR and of fashion, are enforced by an indeterminate authority, but also from all rules enforced by a determinate authority which is either, on the one hand, SUPER-HUMAN, or, on the other hand, politically subordinate. In order to emphasize the fact that 'laws' in the strict sense of the term, are thus authoritatively imposed, they are described as positive laws.” (Black4)
Whatever your romanticized opinion of this government, you must know that by their own official opinions and timeless definitions its law is against morals, against reasoning, against honor, and thus against spirituality and Law under God.
All law in man’s governmental structures are only ever positive law. It’s only design is to steal away every man from his Naturally Pure and negative essence. It is the law of the idols (gods) of nations. But don’t take the author’s word for it. Go to their own source:
POSITIVE LAW - Positive law, as used in opposition to natural law, may be considered in a threefold point of view. 1. The universal voluntary law, or those rules which are presumed to be law, by the uniform practice of nations in general, and by the manifest utility of the rules themselves. 2. The customary law, or that which, from motives of convenience, has, by tacit, but implied agreement, prevailed, not generally indeed among all nations, nor with so permanent a utility as to become a portion of the universal voluntary law, but enough to have acquired a prescriptive obligation among certain states so situated as to be mutually benefited by it. 3. The conventional law, or that which is agreed between particular states by express treaty, a law binding on the parties among whom such treaties are in force. (Bouv1856)
NEGATIVELY - adverb - 1. With or by denial; as, he answered negatively. 2. In the form of speech implying the absence of something; opposed to positively. I shall show what this image of god in man is, negatively by showing wherein it does not consist (stand), and positively, by showing wherein it does consist. 3. Negatively charged or electrified. [See Positively]. (Webs1828)
POSITIVELY - adverb - Absolutely; by itself, independent of any thing else; not comparatively. Good and evil removed may be esteemed good or evil comparatively, and not positively or simply. 1. Not negatively; really; in its own nature; directly; inherently. A thing is positively good, when it produces happiness by its own qualities or operation. It is negatively good, when it prevents an evil, or does not produce it. 2. Certainly; indubitably. This is positively your handwriting. 3. Directly; explicitly; expressly. The witness testified positively to the fact. 4. Peremptorily; in strong terms. The divine law positively requires humility and meekness. 5. With full confidence or assurance. I cannot speak positively in regard to the fact. Positively electrified, in the science of electricity. A body is said to be positively electrified or charged with electric matter, when it contains a superabundance of the fluid, and negatively electrified or charged, when some part of the fluid which it naturally contains, has been taken from it. According to other theorists, when the electric fluid is directed outwards from a body, the substance is electrified positively; but when it is entering or has a tendency to enter another substance, the body is supposed to be negatively electrified. The two species of electricity attract each other, and each repels its own kind. (Webs1828)
POSITIVE - Express; absolute; not doubtful; affirmative; direct : as, a positive or positive— affirmation, condition, evidence, fraud, proof, statute, etc. (WCA1889)
POSITIVE LAW - Law actually ordained or established; statutory regulations; enacted law, or enactments; the lex scripta. (WCA1889)
—=— LEX SCRIPTA
We must never forget that the legal law of today, that romanticized (from Roman times) “law of the land” is not unique to the American constitution in any way, merely the same old repetitive legal law of that moving, ever-evolving kingdom of the pagan Roman Empire. For the strict, civil law is only the continued law of Rome, lex scripta, a creation of the Pope of the Church and State.
LEX TERAE - The law of the land. The phrase is used to distinguish this from the civil or Roman law. 2. By lex terrae, as used in Magna Charta, is meant one process of law, namely, proceeding by indictment or presentment of good and lawful men. In the constitution of Tennessee, the words "the law of the land" signify a general and public law, operating equally upon every member of the community. (Bouv1856)
LEX TERRAE - The law of the land. The common law, or the due course of the common law; the general law of the land. Equivalent to “due process of law.” In the strictest sense, trial by oath; the privilege of making oath. Bracton uses the phrase to denote a freeman's privilege of being sworn in court as a juror or witness, which jurors convicted of perjury forfeited, (legem terrae amittant). The phrase means “the procedure of the old popular law.” (Black4)
LEX SCRIPTA - Written law; law deriving its force, not from usage, but from express legislative enactment; statute law. (From the Latin Maxim) “If the written law be silent, that which is drawn from manners and custom ought to be observed; and, if that is in any manner defective, then that which is next and analogous to it; and, if that does not appear, then the law which Rome uses should be followed.” This maxim of Lord Coke is so far followed at the present day that, in cases where there is no precedent of the English courts, the civil law is always heard with respect, and often, though not necessarily, followed… (Black4)
WRITTEN LAW - or lex scripta. This consists of the constitution of the United States, the constitutions of the several states, the acts of the different legislatures, as the acts of congress, and of the legislatures of the several states, and of treaties. See Statute. (Bouv1856)
—=—
The constitution of the United States is lex scripta. IT IS NOT OF GOD IN AN WAY. So whatever subject-matter is not specified in the written law therein, or by custom, etc., reverts to the Roman (pagan) Law! This is anti-scripture! I cannot stress the importance of this statement by Mr. Bouvier, whose 1856 dictionary was commissioned by Congress and ratified as a strict part of the “law of the land.”
—=—
“The principles of the Roman law, being generally founded in superior wisdom, have insinuated themselves into every part of the law. Many of the refined rules which now adorn the common law appear there without any acknowledgment of their paternity, and it is at this source that some judges dip to get the wisdom which adorns their judgments. The proceedings of the courts of equity and many of the admirable distinctions which manifest their wisdom are derived from this source. To this fountain of wisdom the courts of admiralty owe most of the law which governs in admiralty cases.”
—Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, definition for ‘Sources Of The Law’
—=—
“That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine (law), by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive…”
—Ephesians 4:14, KJB
—=—
“For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine (Law)…”
—1 Timothy 1:10, KJB
—=—
“Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine (law) is not mine, but his that sent me.”
—John 7:16, KJB
—=—
“And the scribes and chief priests heard it, and sought how they might destroy him: for they feared him, because all the people was astonished at his doctrine (Law).”
—Mark 11:18, KJB
—=—
“Listen,” he said, “we're going up to Jerusalem, where the Son of Man will be betrayed to the leading priests and the teachers of religious law. They will sentence him to die and hand him over to the Romans.”
—Mark 10:33, NLT
—=—
“…They bound Jesus, led him away, and took him to Pilate, the Roman governor.”
—Mark 15:1, NLT
—=—
Note here that when the Bible states that the leading teachers and priests of the religious Law will betray and sentence to die the son of Man, this is allegorical, and it means that the priest class will seek to bypass and destroy the Law (Son/Word) of God for all men. Do you not see that this prophesy has come True in every way, through the evangelists of mammon and through the denominations of Roman (Universal), false Christianity? Remember, it was the pope that created the Roman civil law (lex scripta), and that the civil law of the so-called “Jewish” people is not the Bible, but the Talmud.