Back in the day and that would be many days in the past, we were identified in this manor: William, son of Frederick ... Kelly, son of Alphonse ... etc.... There was no "surname" just the first Christian given name followed by the father's first name. What do you think of using this type of call it "verbage" today? If for example we found ourselves in court (and of course it's a place we never want to be) would we be in congruency with being a "man" created by The Creator (Jehovah) to say our first name followed by our father's first name? When called they will be looking for the legal fiction first and surname but to answer as our first name followed by our father's first name and not acknowledge the legal fiction, do you think this would hold up?
kind blessings to All
Yes... remember too that there is no life in words, especially nouns (names/titles). The man is not born with a name, nor is anything in Creation. God does not use language, math, or any symbol representing what is real, for God is Real, Truth. Truth needs nothing to prove itself, and neither do you. It is when you user a name or title that you are making some claim that is unnatural. Only what is not Truth must be proven. As part of Truth (YHVH), you need no first or last name. You need nothing at all. For you exist self-evidently (YHVH). You are part of self-Existence (YHVH). I cannot stress this enough. Words are not of Nature.