I've been keeping the Sabbath and celebrating the biblical feast days for the past year or so but if it's a joke, could you elaborate on why and where I can do some research on the subject?
Thanks Clint, I've been really enjoying your work recently and the discussions between you and Brandon.
Damn clint!
You are most definitely a stickler for detail! I would like to think that you'd be a bestest friend where a guy could sit across from you all night long and never have to think of something to say ... lol
peace and blessings be up on you!
Appologies for the late response, as I have been taking care of my sick mother and mostly offline. She is well again and back off home. Back to it... A joke it is not. The joke is played by corporate Christianity, which has been "Judiazied". It is actually a very easy thing to explain, and of course completely reasonable once you understand it. So is the joke itself, that is, the Jewish (antichrist) law and custom we all suffer from is a mockery of God's Law, usually inverse to that of YHVH. Thus the Jews reject Christ, because Christ is the Law of God personified. They will not follow the Law (Christ). This is public knowledge, of course. What isn't public knowledge is what the Bible words mean despite their judiazed simulation. So, here is an excerpt from my book that explains it in detail, and you know I love my details. It is long because there is no easy way to define terms, terms that we mistake to be in the modern, inverted English language that actually come from customs and languages we are ignorant of. So, from my book, here it is... ----------------------------------------------------------------
“And he said, My presence shall go with thee, and I will give thee rest.” —Exodus 33:14, KJB
—=—
It is interesting to note here that the word Noah in the Bible translates to being at "rest." And of course figuratively, the three states of unrest or "sons" (states of being) of Noah are Seth (name), Ham (red, angry), and Japheth (gullibility). The gullible (generally common caucasoid/Eropid peoples) are ruled by the tribe of the name (genealogy, as the keepers of records of blood inheritance/land-holders), and pitted against the tribe of Ham (the passionate and angry) Middle Eastern peoples under the doctrine of the Quran. No rest is allowed, no peace between nations of goyim. Noah is out to Sea! We will discover more on this figurative nature of the word tribe and the True meanings of all the names in the Bible later. For now, merely realize that every character in the Bible is but a figurative personification and story of you, of your potential in both glory, grace, and in corruption and greed. These are not historical figures, they are character lessons to be learned through trials that can be avoided by the understanding of their individual stories in scritpure. Just look at everything that Noah had to go through just to be at rest, and you will begin to understand the Nature of your own journey towards the even higher, ultimate example of the Lawful man of God.
To "rest" on the Sabbath day, the 7th "day," in honor of the Nature of Jehovah and to give Its fallow fields and Its wondrous beasts of burden rest, that was the commandment of scripture, as Jubilee. But the legal Land-Lords in their Judaic (Old) Law altered that perfect rationality of Natural action under the Supreme Law of Jehovah yet again into a ceremonial, customary replacement of that Natural Law of God. They turned the verb (action of) “rest” into a conceptual noun of fiction and secular (non-spiritual) religion and usury, into a charge of extortion (exaction). They made rest into a fee of penalty. They turned man’s place in Nature as his “interest” in Jehovah and in himself and his own blood kin into a monetary consideration of interest upon his forbearing-of-God and debt obligation to man as god-kings; the land-lords of government. Of course, no man of God would dare to pay interest to another man, for his interests would be solely in serving all men and God in Natural substance, not by the artificial and pointless form of mammon (money). One's Life is only Lived to honor and please God’s Nature in reciprocality for the abundance of that beautiful, edible shelter of Nature. A man of God would never put himself into the debt and surety of another, as the ancient wisdom of the scriptures instruct him to at all times avoid such misadventures that he would surely smart for. For his creditor will become his false god, his idol, and his law-maker, just as the nations and their idolatrous gods. Here again we see the word-smiths magically recreating God’s prescribed teachings of rest and interest into nothing more than fictions of the usurious legal code and system of pirates. Just as man’s person is built upon the back of and collateralized in mammon, so too shall man pay tribute for that person’s anthropomorphized interest in mammon, so that the god of mammon shall rest in the sight of the "peace" of its free-flowing commerce, ruling in supremacy over the land by flooding it with that virtual, legal sea of false legalistic valuation.
Perhaps nothing strikes this author as more ridiculous in the false corporate “Christian” dialectic (fallacious logic) than the notion of “resting” on Sundays only, of going to a corporate church in some masonic temple or building as if that fulfills some obligation to God. It does not. It is not an instruction in the Bible. It is an affront upon the Word. For to participate in evil, in mammon, in commerce six days a week and then pretend to be holy only one day per week is the epitome of ignorance. Nowhere does the Word of God say be evil and ignore the Higher Law except on the Sabbath day once a week. This is the perfect example of the sheer irrational behavior caused by the priest-class, pharisees, the gods of nations, and the usurious changers of money. This concept is about as oxymoronic as a bank holiday (holy day). Imagine that, a banker in mammon celebrating Christmas… How absurd! And so, through these corporate institutions of religion, both Catholic (universal) and its protestors (Protestants), we find a pointless argument based on the Roman Catholic calendar, a creation of man. For as a legal corporation based in mammon (money) and instituted under the legal laws of the state, the idea of the Sabbath must also be made to conform with the ideals of mammon, to the 5 day work-week of legal debt slaves, turning the holy “day” into a vulgar conceptualization of a spiritual vacation from the normalized, everyday sin (syn) committed by the common man in the name of the gods of the state (deified, artificial person) every week. Should the Sabbath take place once a week on the Roman Saturday (Saturn worship) or on the Roman Sunday (Sun worship)?
—=—
“But the mark of the beast can only be defined by the beast itself, AND THE BEAST, ACCORDING TO THE PROPHECY, IS THE PAPAL SYSTEM. So they will have to tell us what their mark is. AND THEY DO, in no uncertain terms… The Sabbath gives authority to God's Law… SO WHEN YOU TOUCH THE SABBATH, YOU TOUCH THE AUTHORITY OF GOD.” —Walter Veith, excerpt from ‘Amazing Discoveries’ lecture series.
—=—
“THE POPE REPRESENTS JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF…” —Excerpt of a letter written from Cardinal Giuseppe Sarto (who became Pope Pius X in 1903) to Don Marino, as quoted in ‘Publications of the Catholic Truth Society’ Volume 29 (Catholic Truth Society: 1896)
—=—
“…for thou art our shepherd, thou art our physician, thou art our governor, thou art our husbandman, THOU ART FINALLY ANOTHER GOD ON EARTH” —Christopher Marcellus addressing Pope Julius II during the Fifth Lateran Council which began in 1512, as quoted in Alexander Hislop, The light of prophecy let in on the dark places of the papacy (London: William Whyte and Co., 1846): 91 and Letters between a Catholic and a Protestant on the doctrines of the Church of Rome originally published in Borrow's Worcester Journal (Worcester Journal, 1827)
—=—
“SUNDAY IS OUR MARK OF AUTHORITY… THE CHURCH IS ABOVE THE BIBLE, and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact.” —Catholic Record, Sept. 1st, 1923
—=—
“Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change was her act… And the act is A MARK OF HER ECCLESIASTICAL POWER AND AUTHORITY in religious matters.” —Excerpt from a letter written October 28, 1895, by C.F. Thomas, Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons
—=—
“We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday.” —‘The Convert’s Catechism of Catholic Doctrine,’ 1957 (page 50)
—=—
“[Not the Creator of the Universe, in Genesis 2:1-3, but the Catholic Church] can claim the honor of having granted man a pause to his work every seven days.” —S.C. Mosna, ‘Storia della Domenica,’ 1969, (pages 366-367)
—=—
“Reason and common sense demand the acceptance of One or the other of these alternatives: EITHER PROTESTANTISM AND THE KEEPING OF SATURDAY, OR CATHOLICITY AND THE KEEPING HOLY OF SUNDAY. Compromise is impossible.” —Excerpt from ‘The Catholic Mirror,’ December 23, 1893
—=—
“SUNDAY IS A CATHOLIC INSTITUTION AND ITS CLAIMS TO OBSERVANCE CAN BE DEFENDED ONLY ON CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES… From the beginning to the end of Scripture there is not a single passage which warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to first." —Catholic Press (Sydney), August 25, 1900
—=—
“In other words, the world will be brought to a point where they will have to CHOOSE BETWEEN THE AUTHORITY OF GOD AND KEEPING THE SABBATH, OR THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH AND KEEPING THE SUNDAY." —Walter Veith, excerpt from ‘Amazing Discoveries’ lecture series.
—=—
“SUNDAY IS FOUNDED NOT ON SCRIPTURE, BUT ON TRADITION, AND IS A DISTINCTLY CATHOLIC INSTITUTION." —Catholic Record, Sept. 17, 1893
—=—
“If you consider Sunday to be the Sabbath, YOU ARE SUBSCRIBING TO THE BABYLONIAN RELIGION." —Milton William “Bill” Cooper, (1943-2001)
—=—
“But he (Jesus christ) answered and said unto them, WHY DO YE ALSO TRANSGRESS THE COMMANDMENT OF GOD BY YOUR TRADITION? …THUS HAVE YE MADE THE COMMANDMENT OF GOD OF NONE EFFECT BY YOUR TRADITION. YE HYPOCRITES, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR FROM ME. BUT IN VAIN THEY DO WORSHIP ME, TEACHING FOR DOCTRINES THE COMMANDMENTS OF MEN." —Matthew 15: 3 and 6-9 (9 repeated), KJB
—=—
Who wins the debate? Nobody, of course! For the foundation of the argument is flawed, the meaning of the word purposefully mistranliterated for the masses of modern illiterate, dog-Latin goyim. The word Sabbath comes from the root of Strong's H7673 - shabath, which is translated into the English words rest, rested (as when God rested on the seventh “day” of creation), cease, put away, put down, to be lacking, celebrate, keep, rid, make, to exterminate, to destroy, to cause to desist, to cause to fail, etc… There is the Sabbatical Year, in which the lands are not plowed, and the Sabbatical week for different cultures. Generally, this is an old-Testament Jewish term that can, in man's vulgarity of legal law, only be utilized politically in a usurious, money-based labor and/or slave labor economy. Its Spirit of intent has been lost, delegated to a literalist translation based on the Roman calendar.
SABBATIC, SABBATICAL - adjective - 1. PERTAINING TO the sabbath. 2. RESEMBLING the sabbath; enjoying or bringing an intermission of labor. Sabbatical year, IN THE JEWISH ECONOMY, WAS EVERY SEVENTH YEAR, IN WHICH THE ISRAELITES WERE COMMANDED TO SUFFER THEIR FIELDS AND VINEYARDS TO REST, OR LIE WITHOUT TILLAGE, and the year next following every seventh sabbatical year in succession, that is, EVERY FIFTIETH YEAR, WAS THE JUBILEE, which was also A YEAR OF REST TO THE LANDS, and a year of redemption or release. Leviticus 15:1. (Webs1828)
—=—
Of course, when we see that this word “day” is yet another obfuscating word used in the King’s dog-Latin confusion of terms of art, we may take a whole new meaning from this word, which figuratively may mean anything from a day to a year to a lifetime, and even as an entire age. The rigmarole of this 7 day schedule has nothing of the spirit within its design, the modern calendar of course being a Roman creation. Only he who is unspiritually fixed in the pursuit of worldly possessions via the vessel and misadventure of commercial citizen-ship would suffer such a schedule of tolerated corruption of mind, capitalist employment (use) of the body, and an accepted, indiscriminate perversion of the soul. Did Jesus the christ follow this Jewish custom in mammon? Was christ somehow, oxymoronically a Jew? Did he follow the purely secularized, Jewish tradition of the Sabbath?
—=—
“And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, BECAUSE HE HAD DONE THESE THINGS ON THE SABBATH DAY.” —John 5:16, KJB
—=—
“And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day? And they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go; And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day? And they could not answer him again to these things.” —Luke 14: 3-6, KJB
—=—
“And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands. And certain of the Pharisees said unto them, Why do ye that which is NOT LAWFUL to do on the sabbath days? And Jesus answering them said, HAVE YE NOT READ SO MUCH AS THIS, WHAT DAVID DID, WHEN HIMSELF WAS AN HUNGRED, AND THEY WHICH WERE WITH HIM; How he went into the house of God, and did take and eat the shewbread, and gave also to them that were with him; WHICH IT IS NOT LAWFUL TO EAT BUT FOR THE PRIESTS ALONE?” —Luke 6: 1-4, KJB
—=—
Now it's your turn, you of the so-called "Christian" flattering title and that bears the empty symbol of the cross… Have you not read what David did? Have you not read what christ did over and over in respect of the Pure and permanent Sabbath in spite of the Jewish priest-class and Pharisees of the old Law and purely Babylonian religious-based tradition? Do you not see that even christ was trying to parabolically talk sense into you? Do you not see that your work in legality and mammon is not acceptable on any day or at any time, in the figurative eyes of God's Nature and Law, for it benefits not God's kingdom nor protects its Nature and Its Design? Can you not see that the legal custom of keeping the Sabbath is merely an excuse by the ecclesia and corporate church and state to cause men to sin (to go against God's law) the other 6 days a week? If all days are Sabbath, if the Sabbath is Eternal, what need is there of man's artful world, debt instruments, and law, and how does one justify such a fictional license from God's Law every other day but "Sunday," like a Roman holiday? It is important to understand here that the word Sabbath differs from the biblical word sabbaton, which is not spiritual or of God in any way. Jesus the christos then exclaims the following:
—=—
“And he said unto them, That the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.” —Luke 6:5, KJB
—=—
But how can this be, unless the word here used is not the word Sabbath (capitalized), but instead the uncapitalized or general meaning of the word in man's legal domain? And that's exactly what we find, another confusing transliteration from the king (false god and lord). Here, a different word is intended, which is Strong's G4521 - σάββατον, or sabbaton. And, of course, we find this term to be intended as exactly what we would expect of those adversaries and false gods of mammon. The word sabbaton is strictly a secular, legalistic word of Hebrew origin, with no spiritual, Higher Law aspect to it at all.
Sabbaton is defined as "the Sabbath (i.e., Shabbath), OR DAY OF WEEKLY REPOSE FROM SECULAR AVOCATIONS (also the observance or institution itself); by extension, a se'nnight, i.e., the interval between two Sabbaths; likewise the plural in all the above applications: Ñsabbath (day), week.
And Stong's outline of Biblical usage for this mistransliterated word are as follows: G4521 - σάββατον, or sabbaton 1. THE SEVENTH DAY OF EACH WEEK which was A SACRED FESTIVAL on which THE ISRAELITES WERE REQUIRED TO ABSTAIN FROM ALL WORK. A. THE INSTITUTION of the sabbath, THE LAW for keeping holy every seventh day of the week. B. A single sabbath, sabbath day. 2. Seven days, a week...
With a bit of further due diligence, we find this to be a strictly Jewish, Talmudic (civil law) legal concept only, including the law of a sabbath-day’s journey, defined in Theyer's Greek Lexicon as "the distance it is lawful to travel on the sabbath-day or sabbaton according to the Talmud," being "two-thousand cubits or paces." In comparison, the secular sabbaton of the Jew is to the actual holy Sabbath of God what the day Sunday is to the timelessness of God's Word/Law. It is ritualistic, secular nonsense that pretends to replace the Reality of the keeping of True Law at all times. It is like attending a weekly, ritualistic church service to pay for your sins the rest of the week. And it is utterly ridiculous in the parabolic stories of christ. As Mr. Veith, a "Seventh Day Adventist" is quoted as saying above, the choice is God's Sabbath or Rome's calender day of the week as a sabbatic mark of authority over God's Word/Law/Son. But the answer is not to worship Saturn (Saturday) as the one day out of seven to act christlike, but to worship all days and all times as Sabbath without error or exception, without license or popish indulgences, and without secular logic or ritual pomp and circumstance. The Sabbath is not a sabbatical from a sinful agency with devil's (attorney's) once per week, but a permanent Lifestyle that defeats those devils, the artificers and their schemes.
(IN OTHER WORDS, IT SOULD READ "KEEP THE DAY (ALL DAYS) SABBATH," NOT "KEEP THE SABBATH DAY" (A SINGLE DAY OF SEVEN). FOR WHAT DAY IS NOT HOLY? REMEMBER, TO BE AT "REST" LIKE THE EXAMPLE OF MOSES MEANS TO NOT BE AT ODDS OR EMNITY WITH YHVH AND ITS LAW (CHRISTOS/LOGOS).
Remember, the new Law (Son) fulfills the old Law. The Sabbath, as the secularized sabbaton, is the old Law, and is based solely on commercial enterprise, a ceasing of paid or involuntary slave-labor as a day of legal, secular rest. It has its basis, in other words, on nothing of christ's teachings. This is to say that if men were acting piously in Pure Charity and at all times in Love and in the Grace of God's Nature and Law, the Sabbath would be a pointless custom, for it would never end. For there is nothing of God's commandments that would be outlawed on the Jewish Sabbath. Charity is not an employment, it is a permanent Lifestyle. One would not cease to be Charitable in all things and works every day but the so-called sabbaton. One that is a son of God needs no Sabbath, for every day is kept as Sabbath. And so I am sorry, but if you believe in and utilize this old Law of commerce, be it Saturday or Sunday or any day, month, or year, you are just not what you think you are. God's Law is not to be turned on and off like a Light-switch. All days are, and all Being is of Jehovah. Every second of every day and in every aspect of one's Life is to be kept as the Sabbath. And most importantly, money in any form can hold no place in the Sabbath. Ultimately, the ridiculousness of the situation boils down to this: either you will sin Monday thru Saturday and keep Sunday as God's day or you will protest and sin instead Sunday through Friday and keep Saturday alone for the Law and works of God. This is patently idiotic. For what christ is attempting to teach the Pharisees and lawyers above is a timeless lesson, that work (employments) in man’s system of law and commerce are opposed to the works of the followers of christ (God’s Law/Word/Son). It is not work to save a Life, but part of the works of Pius men under Jehovah. It is not work to feed the hungry, but the required and expected timeless works of all men of God. We are not to work (for wages) against God all the days of the week, and only on the seventh day of the Roman calendar week rest from our sins. This is certainly not a commandment of God, to sin 6 of 7 days just so that one may keep the separate, Sabbath day holy. Nor can any man possibly think this to be a reasonable custom for men of christ’s teachings under the New Testament, now that this ludicrous idea of a “Sabbath day” in the time domain of strictly commercial Roman law is no longer occulted from one’s Natural Reason. The debate is absolutely, 100% fallacious. It is a religious and legal debate, not a spiritual one under the Law of God’s Nature.
—=—
“Then said Jesus unto them, I will ask you one thing; Is it lawful on the sabbath days to do good, or to do evil? to save life, or to destroy it?” —Luke 6:9, KJB
—=—
With his interest laid firmly upon the legalistic dependence of money, man's stake in Jehovah and the True Nature of keeping the Sabbath holy is of course lost. For his stake (cross) becomes paper thin in form only and without any anchor to the land (to God, to Reality). Our notion of what rest is has been transliterated into a commercial term of art, a simulation of the Real. Noah was Truly at rest with God, for he wrestled not against the Law of God. The word Noah means “rest.” We, however, are all parabolically lost at sea without an ark of the covenant. From action (verb) to fiction (noun)
RESTS - noun - Periodical BALANCING’S OF AN ACCOUNT, (particularly in mortgage and trust accounts), made for the purpose of CONVERTING INTEREST INTO PRINCIPAL, and CHARGING THE PARTY LIABLE thereon with compound interest. (Black4)
INTEREST - verb transitive - [Latin inter and esse.] 1. To concern; TO AFFECT; to excite emotion or passion, usually in favor, but SOMETIMES AGAINST A PERSON OR THING. A narration of suffering interests us in favor of the sufferer. We are interested in the story or in the fate of the sufferer. We are interested to know the result, ISSUE or EVENT of an ENTERPRISE. It is followed by in or for. We are interested in the narration, but for the sufferer. 2. TO GIVE A SHARE IN. Christ, by his atonement, has INTERESTED BELIEVERS in the blessings of THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 3. TO HAVE A SHARE. We are not all interested in the public funds, but we are all interested in the happiness of a free government. 4. TO ENGAGE; as, to interest one in our favor. TO INTEREST ONE'S SELF, IS TO TAKE A SHARE OR CONCERN IN - noun - Concern; advantage; good; as PRIVATE INTEREST; PUBLIC INTEREST. Divisions hinder the common interest and public good. 1. INFLUENCE OVER OTHERS. They had now lost their interest at court. He knew his interest sufÞcient to procure the office. 2. SHARE; PORTION; PART; PARTICIPATION IN VALUE. He has parted with his interest in the stocks. He has an interest in a manufactory of cotton goods. 3. Regard to PRIVATE profit. 'Tis interest calls off all her sneaking train. 4. PREMIUM PAID FOR THE USE OF MONEY; the profit per cent derived from money lent, OR PROPERTY USED BY ANOTHER PERSON, OR FROM DEBTS REMAINING UNPAID. Commercial states have a legal rate of interest. Debts on book BEAR an interest after the expiration of the credit. Courts allow interest in many cases where it is not stipulated. A higher rate of interest than that which THE LAW ALLOWS, is called usury. Simple interest is that which arises from the principal sum only. Compound interest is that which arises from the principal with the interest added; INTEREST ON INTEREST. 5. Any surplus advantage. With all speed, you shall have your desire with interest. (Webs1828)
—=—
If a man’s interest is in money, and if everything in his purview of conscious thought is therefore to be valued only in money, including his own life and its taxable future labor potential (actuarial), then man’s master is obviously money (mammon). Though man may kill for money to obtain a temporary but false sense of financial freedom, he will somehow not do the same to gain his ability to be free from that very same system of enslavement. It is very important to know that man in person-hood and citizen-ship has not merely his every interest in money, but that his name is only money under mammon. His signature is magically monetized into new debt currency, creating new money from that dark void, as all money under mammon represents only debt (to the god of nothingness). Only form, no substance, as a false god. Money is created by man’s use of that person in ad-venture capitalism, and the creation of money by his name (signature) upon any and every application is likened unto a virtual charge against the christian name of Jehovah, a sacrifice to appease the god of money so as to hold at bay the God of Nature. Every aspect of our civil life in personhood revolves around our interest in money. And yet the money is never ours. We have the mere privilege of use. It is only ever attached to the admixed commercial surname. We cannot actually earn anything Naturally by using another’s political property to receive it. What is purchased (conquered) by it therefore cannot be our own, for the acquiring of anything by money is always false; an artificial title for public use. But the public is a domain not our own. The public owns our surname. What is received in citizen-ship can be confiscated at any time by the creator-government of that ship. And we pay a heavy price indeed, not only by the usury charged from our mere use of another’s money (commercial paper), but in the fact that we are the actual collateral for that money. Our names are created by and only as monetary considerations (financial instruments) for the use and creation of more money, a charge that can never be paid back by permanent debtors with no ability to discharge our foundational, constituted performance debt. Without debt, however, government would cease to exist. For a constitution is a debt compact. No debt, no constituted authorities, and no nation. Its very purpose is debt and no other. Its only power issues from debt. Its constitution is defined as "a debt compact." All of its laws revolve around debt and the foolish debtors who faithfully charge it in pledge. Its only purpose is to service debt. It is truly a debtor’s hell with no possibility of escape under its circular system of law… Which is why we must overcome its artful designs and abandon its false gods.
CAPITULATION - noun - 1. The act of capitulating, or SURRENDERING to an enemy upon stipulated terms or conditions. 2. The treaty or instrument containing the conditions of surrender. 3. A REDUCING TO HEADS. 4. In German polity, a contract which the Emperor makes with the electors, in the names of the princes and states of the empire, before he is raised to the imperial dignity. (Webs1828)
—=—
Man is reduced to heads. Another word for head is capita. Man is considered per capita; per head… just like cattle. This and the valuation and monetization of each head of chattel is called capitalism.
CAPUT - A head; THE HEAD OF A PERSON; the whole person; the life of a person; ONE'S PERSONALITY; STATUS; CIVIL CONDITIONÉ In civil law. It signiÞed a person's civil condition or status, AND AMONG THE ROMANS CONSISTED OF THREE COMPONENT PARTS OR ELEMENTS, —libertas, liberty; civitas, citizenship; and familia, family. (Black4)
is that which arises from the principal sum only. Compound interest is that which arises from the principal with the interest added; INTEREST ON INTEREST. 5. Any surplus advantage. With all speed, you shall have your desire with interest. (Webs1828)
CAPITA - Heads, and, Þguratively, entire bodies, WHETHER OF PERSONS OR ANIMALS. PERSONS INDIVIDUALLY CONSIDERED, WITHOUT RELATION TO OTHERS, (polls); as distinguished from stirpes or STOCKS OF DESCENT. The term in this sense, making part of the common phrases, in capita, per capita, is derived from the civil law. (Black4)
PER CAPITA - By heads; by the poll; as individuals. In the distribution of an intestate's personalty, the persons legally entitled to take are said to take per capita, that is, EQUAL SHARES, WHEN THEY CLAIM, EACH IN HIS OWN RIGHT, AS IN EQUAL DEGREE OF KINDRED; in contradistinction to claiming by right of representation, or per stripes. (Black4)
CAPITE - Latin. By the head. TENURE IN CAPITE was an ancient FEUDAL TENURE, whereby a man HELD LANDS OF THE KING IMMEDIATELY. It was of two sorts: the one, PRINCIPAL AND GENERAL, or OF THE KING AS THE SOURCE OF ALL TENURE; the other, special and subaltern, or of a particular subject. It is now abolished. Jacob. As to distribution per capita, see Capita, per. (Black4)
CAPITE MINUTUS - In the civil law. One who had suffered capitis diminutio, ONE WHO LOST STATUS OR LEGAL ATTRIBUTES. (Black4)
CAPITIS DIMINUTION - In Roman law. A DIMINISHING OR ABRIDGMENT OF PERSONALITY; A LOSS OR CURTAILMENT OF A MAN'S STATUS OR AGGREGATE OF LEGAL ATTRIBUTES AND QUALIFICATIONS. (Black4) —=— What is abolished as law is often recreated through voluntary contract. Any law can be created via contract, as long as the contract stands and all parties agree to it. And so, while direct feudalism is certainly no longer the law, contractual feudalism by another name certainly is. It's called US citizenship. It is the nature of being a public person under an implied social contract.
The public acts in capita (by the head), and so the private god "We, the People" through its constituted government takes (taxes) per capita. The private always acts in the re-presentation of and as a part of a bloodline of some private family or lineal stock in fabled genealogy, while the public person in agency never acts in his own right (e.g., sui juris) or blood-right but through the property (person) of another. In other words, the public person and thus the man standing in surety to it is stuck in (pledged to) a modern rent, a re-presented feudatory tenancy upon the private lands of the gods of the nation. The man in public person represents his Self as something he his not, and certainly not by his connection of blood and Arms to some private family. His family is in the stead of the state, that creator of publicity, the nation to which a fictional person's birth and nativity is rendered and certified, and then confirmed and ratified by the man acting thereof in agency. The private man has no thing to render back to Caesar, for his private person (status) is not born (rendered) by that district of seizure, distress, and distraint. The public person shares only in the bloodless, backwards live (evil) of fictional things.
Evil is not merely some Biblical term. In fact, it was used for a variety of ailments, diseases, and political conditions in days of old. We forget sometimes that all the words of the Bible were in existence long before the Bible was written, and that such existence through the magic spelling of artful terms was certainly not in origin an English existence or intent. A simulacra has no True source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope that clears it up for you. The sabbath is not a day, becase day doesn't mean a single day, nor is "Sunday" a creation of Nature (YHVH). All so-called time, all so-called space, all so-called True things are to be kept as the sabbath at all times without exception or "rest," for secular activity is not of YHVH and serves some false god instead. If you cannot have two masters, why would we be instructed to be in commerce 6 days and in holy celebration to YHVH only one day? LOL! The religious joke is on us! Finally, here is a a maxim of law that shows the custom of a secularly celebrated (once a week) sabbath to be false:
“When there is concurrence of means, HE WHO HAS CHOSEN ONE CANNOT HAVE RECOURSE TO ANOTHER.” —Electa una via, non datur recursus ad alteram. 10 Toull. n. 170. (BouvMaxim)
Enjoy your "day" all ye secularist hypocrites!!!
-Clint