Dear brothers and siStars and you too clint :-),
It's bin a while since starting clint's great work of the Strawman and I've been trying to give respect to him by reading it in full and think it is possibly a requirement to be a part of this group? After some time I've only managed 735 pages, the biggest undertaking of reading in my life which probably translates into two thousand pages of normal size fonted script. Clint I'm asking a bit of forgiveness here if this question will be answered on my completion of the book but it's been nagging me for a while so thought to put it out there?
So I'm clear that we are slaves or less than that by being goyim and we've been taught a language of a canine nature by the ones who don't want us to know the language they speak in order that they may stay in control. So "all" Romanized languages are dog Latin and the English language is dog Latin, but what about pig Latin? I say pig as a guess that perhaps would apply to all other languages?
You take great pains in the book to provide in depth origin and definitions of the words that we use in English, but what about Cyrillic languages like Russian, Slavic dialects and then the symbolic language of Asia like Chinese and the hundreds of dialects? Without taking these languages into account considerably more than half of the realms population doesn't fit with the criteria in the book? How do these tribes of others and large populations fit into the order of things? I know we are "all" controlled, it's very easy to see this throughout the realm but being there are many of Jehovah's Creations walking the plane I'm not seeing how it all fits together?
Blessings to All,
The documentary I show in Season two of Red Pill covers the history of this name of God conundrum. The Catholics attend churches that are so old that YHVh is written above the entrance, yet the attendees have no idea what the Name of God is, and feel God shouldn't have a name. That's the power of hypocrites and simulators (useful idiots) in religion. It was the church that did it, make no mistake.
On the other so-called books of the Bible, I would be cautious. The greatest litmus test is to do what you should do in all things, seek the self-evident Truth (YHVH) in those books. Are they teaching the moral, spiritual Law of God or are they not? The book of Enoch is a great horror script, but does it really belong in the Bible?
Actually, that is an understandable and good question!
A parallell question would be: which Bible version or language should I read? When doing this research, that is, looking at the concordances and lexicons and dictionaries and any other sources available, one finds that it is not one language or culture, but a mismash of words and ideals from many languages and cultures. Much of the conceptualization of "christ" or LOGOS comes from the era of the Greeks, Plato, etc. Much comes from the Hebrew, the Chaldian, etc. The Bible is not merely the perview of one culture or language, but all. This is very evident by merely viewing the lexicons, which are similar to an etymology study, where each word is explained or defined (translated to English) from each language set. This means that in fact the Bible is absolutely universal (global) in its application, as is the legal system in any other language.
The thing is, when reading the English version of King James, from which the concordances were fashioned, they reveal all these ancient terms from ancient languages, some of which are "now considered "dead" or unused today. The trickery of the king's Bible is not in subversion of the Word itself, but in the misues of words. That is to say that by changing the very specific terms like YHVH and elohim into the word "god" we are often misled as to whether the Bible refers to "YHVH" or to a man like the Pope acting in the stead of YHVH or Christos. But if you take each word and look up the ancient meanings as translated, which are generally metaphoric in their useage, then you can overcome the purposeful obfuscation caused by genericizing the terms, by making proper names or terms into generall or generic ones. The definitions from all relevent cultures or langauges are all there, and often the verse is given for each specific use. There are over 50 words (names and titles) that were replaced by the words "god" and "lord", for instance. The other aspect of this is that, sine the Bible is opposed to man's legal system and terms of art, which in all cases depend on some form of devil's (attorney/agentic) CONTRACT, a bond and surety to some status (persona) not your own but of legal fiction, we can thus decipher the fact that the Bible Law (The Law of Truth/Nature/Reality/True Self) is universal, meaning it applies to all the people of God's Creation. Everyone is suseptable to legal evils. And, of course, as the book goes over, the #1 goal of United Nations Agenda 2030 is that all men recieve the mark of legal, digital identity (personhood) by this year 2030. Without false persona (mask/legal status), there is no implication of contract, of bond, or of surety. The law of man is artificial, fiction, and therefore can only be applied to men two ways, by force or by status (person). And so over and over the Bible instructs all men to reject all forms of personhood, be it the indivudual or that which is incorporated. A government that is a person (corporation) is not to be respected, for it's existence is artificial (not spirutal) and it's purpose and intent is to go againt the Law of Nature (Truth). So, the short answer is that yes, the Bible reflects the language and culture of all people. Nationality and ethnicity are artificial constructs, inventions of man. The Bible as Law is merely that which opposes all forms of legal sytems and cultures that stand opposed to God's Law (Christ/Logos), against what is Truth. The Bible is opposed to fiction. Easy Peasy.
-Clint