Legal/Fictional matters

Thanks for your information bftf2212. Crowe has done much to wake us up, but he does put his faith, at least in public, in these questionable practices And encourage us to buy their programs. I am not ending with him any longer. ilene

Crowe is about the biggest fraud out there. Don't be fooled. I know personally...

Absolute fraud. He is aware of my work debunking his favorite gurus KL and Alphonse. And he still promotes the fraudsters. Mutual contacts have tried to get me on with him but he refuses. Probably because he knows I'd expose his whole grift. Don't even get me started on his flat earth and skyclock nonsense.

Thank you for your expansion of these ideas we have heard. You bring up good points. they say don’t try this until you learn the details, then you have to buy a $5-10K course to learn them! I heard Crowe tell a story of a woman who went to court and just said she was not the person named on the ticket and saying something like, that is not me, I believe you are looking for the beneficiary, not sure if I have it right, and the judge dismissed the case. They also say they literally throw a piece of paper at the judge demonstrating something about not being in their maritime jurisdiction. I wouldn’t try any of this, but I’m also not buying the course. Let’s do our best to stay out of court!

One does not show up in a court as a man. This is impossible. This would be like playing a board game of Monopoly without a game piece. The peice is the person of the player. The player uses the money and title of the legal (artificial) setting of the game, and the money always goes back to the banker, because the money is debt and is property of the game, never the person. The person is property of government, not you. You are a user of the person, not the Creator/owner. Persons are administrated, like employees, not free men. Men are never administered, only legal persons, places, and things (properties). Real Men (Creations of God) cannot be recognized in court (invention of man), anymore than a cartoon can appear in real life. A Person makes an legal, fictional "APPEARANCE" after being "SUMMONED" like a ghost. A man does not appear, only a person, as represented by either the man or attorney as its agent. But the man is never recognized, only the legal fiction. As an agent, you (the Man) and the attorney are bound in allegience and duty to the court, the attorney being and officer of the court. Men cannot appear out of thin air as fictional characters, only persons can. Persons cannot appear by themselves, they must have some agent using it. From the Latin, persona means "a mask." Anyone, any legal guru that claims to go to court and says I am a man when asked if the person is present in the courtroom is a fraud. The judge will instantly know you have no idea what you are talking about and that you are part of this lame-duck tax protest/truther movement. The judge will continue to call for the person (your legal name) or the agent for the person (i.e. attorney). There is no other option. Again, men cannot be administered in a legal setting, only his status (person) in that legal jurisdiction. To act in person, and to appear in person or with an attorney (assigned agent) is to be in bond and surety to all commerce (a federal jurisdiction) in which that person has done, which is all commerce on public record. That person is required as a well-defeind "taxpayer" to pay taxes.

Avoidance or protest of taxes is a non sequitor (non-starter). There is either taxable (public) commerce or there is private (foreign) commerce. Generally, to be private (foreign) in your trade, using US dollars, one must be doing commerce in only the state (intrastate) and not between states (interstate), and if you are smart, doing it through a dummy company instead of in a foreign US person. US persons are foreigners in the states. Federal law is sovereign in the foreign (private) states when done by US persons. The whole point, as the Bible instructs, is to stop acting in and doing business as a US person. Eventually, the point is to never us at all or get any benefit or right from that federal corporation of D.C. Remember, the word district means to be in distress, distraint, and seizure (Caesar). But also remember that the only reason you are in the district is as a voluntary citizen thereof, acting in its person instead of being private (foreign) from it in your own state. The legal solution is to instead invent your own person (company, trust, PMA, etc.) in the state only, and stop doing interstate commerce of any kind if possible. As such, the important detail here is to not attach your public US person to the private one you create in liue of that federal persona. That's where a trust attorney or Brandon comes in to play. And that's where these false tax protest gurus we are exposing as complete frauds try and intercept you and trick you into their very bad "paperwork" for entertainment and education purposes only. Intstant red flag! Ironicially, they have convinced you not to trust attorneys, and that they instaed have your best interest at heart. This is like hiring an unexperienced child to do a professional carpenters work.

I only trust Brandon because I vetted, paid, and recieved what he promised.

But this is not to say that going to an attorney that specializes in trusts is not a good option. It is to say that guys like Brandon are the extreme exception in this alternative sphere. However, this is to say that trust attorneys are a dime a dozen and will generally use the same form-letter documents with your name and some added langauge, which is not a bad thing, for that means that when the trust is administered it will be similar and carry precidents that are expected. This is why Brandon has spent so much of his money on buying high profile trusts so as to use that proper and binging language in his own documents.

The difference again is that this is not a do it yourself course or a "buy my paperwork" scam.

Most importantly is to remember that you are not a person. You act in the character and status of the person when you use the money system, mail, and other properties of corporations and governments.

To quote the US dollar: "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER `FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE"

Public = Federal Private = State/anonymous

IMPORTANT: A US PERSON IS NEVER PRIVATE. IT IS PROPERTY OF ITS CREATOR.

Maxim of law: THE CREATOR CONTROLS

Hope that helps.

-Clint

BTW... if you want to succeed in court, 90% of it is just reading the rules of evidence, the rules of criminal procedure, the rules of court procedure. These are corporate, administrative courts, not legitimate ones. The rest is reading court opinion (published case law). Most cses are decided according to the rule or doctrine of stare decises. The Latin term stare decisis refers to the doctrine of precedent, which obliges judges to make certain court decisions according to previous rulings made by a higher court in the same type of case. The purpose of stare decisis is to promote consistent, predictable rulings on cases of similar nature. While prior decisions often become precedent in the U.S., adherence is not absolute. To explore this concept, consider the following stare decisis definition.

Definition of Stare Decisis

Pronounced

ster-ē-di-ˈsī-səs

Noun

1. A legal doctrine in which a decision previously reached by a court is used as authority in all future cases that are based on the same basic circumstances or facts.

Origin

1782 Latin stāre dēcīsīs (to stand by decided matters)

History of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis

The doctrine of stare decisis, or precedent law, has its beginning in 12th century England, when King Henry II established a unified system of deciding legal maters. In this system, referred to as “common law,” the decisions of the King’s judges in various regions were respected by the other judges in deciding similar cases. As the colonists came to America, they brought with them the common law system, including the principle of stare decisis. Over the centuries, the principle of stare decisis has also become known as “binding precedent,” or “binding authority.”

Which Courts Set Precedent

Within the hierarchy of the U.S. court system, the decisions of a higher court, such as an appellate court, or supreme court, become binding precedent, or obligatory stare decisis, on lower courts. In some cases, precedent set by a court of lateral jurisdiction, meaning a court at the same level, becomes binding authority, though more often, decisions made by lateral or lower courts are used as persuasive authority, rather than binding authority. This means that these decisions are used to guide the thought process of the judge, without requiring a certain ruling. -Clint

Clint,

I value your opinion based on your experience and knowledge, thank you. My opinion of Crowe just went down many notches. I think I asked Rose to have you back on the show at some point, and she said something like they did not want to pursue more interviews with you without explanation, now I see why. I find many of his shows and guests to be questionable. I did enjoy Cal’s interpretation of Genesis, if you ever heard that. I understand we shouldn’t claim to be the person, but if I end up in court for whatever reason, I would have to act in that respect, as I have heard you say, otherwise we would be in contempt, cause why did we show up in the first place. I am confused and slowly learning how to act and be in the private. That is why I am here. Thanks for having this forum and website! Good luck. You are highly under-followed. I am spreading the word. And Josie really did a beautiful job of narrating your book. Her style and enunciation and voice are lovely to listen to. I am eagerly awaiting the paper copy, I think it may have arrived today.

Hugs,

Ilene